Filip Pieczonka vs Ricardas Berankis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance analysis shows Berankis winning 47.62% of points compared to Pieczonka's 50.38%. Could Pieczonka's slight edge on the second serve make a difference?
• In return games, Berankis performs marginally better, winning 43.64% of opponents' second serve points versus Pieczonka's 42.15%.
• Handling pressure is crucial; Berankis saves 59.24% of breakpoints, significantly higher than Pieczonka's 42.22%. Is this Berankis's strongest advantage in the match?
• Boxing the performance in the last year: Berankis has a winning percentage of 56.6%, slightly behind Pieczonka's 61.22%.
• Both players have their best winning percentage on I.hard: Berankis at 66% and Pieczonka at 62%.
• Event level affects performance; Berankis plays mostly in Challengers/ITF > $10K with a 56.86% win rate, while Pieczonka competes in Futures/ITF $10K circles, winning 64.1% of matches.
• Direct encounters show they have clashed once, with Pieczonka winning after Berankis retired. Can past outcomes predict future results?
• Berankis faces slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank of 308.32 compared to Pieczonka's 416.43. Does playing against stronger competition offer an edge?
• In deciding sets over the past year, Berankis has a solid 59% win rate, compared to Pieczonka's 50%.
• Berankis is more successful at converting breakpoints, with a 31.08% conversion rate versus Pieczonka's 18.92%.

Editorial Prediction (August 4, 2025, UTC):

As Berankis and Pieczonka prepare to meet on the court again, the stats reveal a close battle but also hint at potential advantages. Although Pieczonka has shown slightly better results with a higher overall win percentage and second serve points won, Berankis boasts stronger breakpoint defense and conversion, crucial areas where matches can be won or lost.

Berankis also faces tougher opponents on average, suggesting a possible edge when it comes to adapting and strategizing against various players. Moreover, his ability to save breakpoints under pressure significantly outshines Pieczonka’s, providing a robust foundation to fend off critical situations. While Pieczonka holds a narrow lead in past encounters, the match was left unfinished due to Berankis retiring.

Taking into account Berankis’s strengths in high-pressure scenarios and more consistent results against formidable competition, he seems poised to claim victory in the upcoming match. Given these observations, Berankis is most likely to emerge victorious.